An all too familiar scenario for those of us on the marketing side of technology companies
Hat tip:http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/downfall-gartner-mq/
Filed under: Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
An all too familiar scenario for those of us on the marketing side of technology companies
Hat tip:http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/downfall-gartner-mq/
Filed under: Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Just a nice change of pace! Are delays and innovation closely connected?
Filed under: Cloud | Tagged: innovation | Leave a Comment »
Just a simpler graphic to explain the pricing from the AWS page.
Filed under: Cloud, IaaS, Procurement | Tagged: AWS, economics, innovation | 2 Comments »
Courtesy: techdirt.com
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: economics | Leave a Comment »
From CIO Magazine:
There are effectively four enterprise vendors today: IBM, HP, Oracle-Sun Microsystems (which are due to merge), and now arguably Cisco Systems, EMC and VMware.. via Acadia. … as good as anything arriving out of a merger. These mergers and joint agreements are giving the enterprise vendors the means to sell complete data center infrastructure environments.
My take:
Filed under: Cloud, Procurement | Tagged: cloud101 | Leave a Comment »
Notes from Nick Carr, who’s a rockstar in his own right:
Filed under: Cloud | Tagged: Carr, IT sages | Leave a Comment »
My take:
Filed under: Cloud, PaaS | Tagged: Azure | Leave a Comment »
Writes Peter Kretzman:
Flickr, Gmail, and Facebook are great services, but declaring that they represent the burgeoning trend of cloud computing is as incomplete and unsatisfying as explaining the Grand Canyon as just a tourist attraction in Arizona.
The problem here, and the reason that so many of these mainstream articles get it so wrong, is they’re trying to explain cloud computing as a consumer-oriented phenomenon, and it’s basically not. Not the exciting or “new” part, anyway.
Read the rest of this extremely well-written article.
Filed under: Cloud | Tagged: cloud101, media | Leave a Comment »
Writes Michael Hickins:
The thing that most stuck with me was his idea that if all companies do is run the same systems in the cloud as they have in their data centers without changing their business processes, they’re simply going to be dealing with “a cloud-based hairball instead of an on-premise hairball.”
Coughing up the hairball by using different (and theoretically better) business processes isn’t just about cost-cutting. Changing business processes also means relieving IT departments of mundane administrative tasks like patch management and version upgrades, and allowing them to create new applications that can actually give companies a leg up on their competitors.
My take:
Filed under: Cloud | Tagged: business process, innovation | Leave a Comment »
Hat tip to Ben Kepes:
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: Humor | 1 Comment »